Instant Checkmate
Criminal-record and social-profile search option.
View RecordsSeparate Texas DWI court outcomes, criminal-history information and driving records before interpreting a result.
| Question | Official record family | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| What happened to the criminal charge? | Trial-court case held by the appropriate county/district/municipal/justice court or clerk | Shows filed charge, amendments, plea, dismissal, judgment and sentence as applicable |
| What appears in Texas criminal history? | Texas DPS Criminal History Name Search | Shows public criminal-history information available under DPS rules; it is a name-based matching product |
| What happened to driving privileges? | Texas DPS Driver Record | Driving record can contain violations, crashes and suspensions depending on record type; this is not the criminal court file |
| Was there an administrative license action? | Texas DPS ALR program | ALR is a civil administrative process separate from the criminal DWI prosecution |
DPS Criminal History Search tries name variations and can narrow with date of birth. The interface reports what fields matched.
DPS Crime Records FAQ says fingerprint-based searches are the most accurate method for matching a criminal record; name-based searches can match multiple candidates or miss the intended person.
DPS explains that its criminal-history repository is built from information submitted by criminal justice agencies within Texas. Do not label that result as a national search.
DPS directs a person disputing a name-based result to a personal fingerprint review to determine whether a record actually belongs to them.
The Texas Judicial Branch FAQ says the custodian depends on the trial-court type: the record may be with a district or county clerk, a justice court, or a municipal court. Use the county, court and case number from the DWI matter to request the disposition, judgment or other document you actually need.
| Court record field | How to read it |
|---|---|
| Arrest/complaint/charging entry | Shows allegation or initiation, not final guilt |
| Amended charge | Can change how the case should be categorized |
| Dismissal/acquittal | Outcome that must not be flattened into “had a DWI conviction” |
| Judgment/conviction | Court outcome; use the actual judgment when exact offense or sentence matters |
DPS publishes several driver-record types. Some provide three-year history, others list all crashes/violations in the driving record, and the certified abstract includes suspensions.
DPS driver-record FAQ says a drug or DWI conviction reported incorrectly must be corrected by the court that filed the original report; DPS updates after receiving the court correction.
Driver eligibility/status is a separate question from whether a past criminal charge was dismissed or resulted in conviction.
Texas DPS describes ALR as a civil administrative process tied to certain test refusals/failures and states that it is unrelated to the criminal court proceedings. A person can therefore have an ALR suspension entry while the criminal case has a different procedural status.
The Texas Judicial Branch publishes current forms and separate statutory routes, including DWI-specific model orders in some categories.
Eligibility depends on the statute, offense, disposition and history. A missing public result can also have causes other than nondisclosure, so do not infer a sealing order without the court record.
If an order exists, preserve the order/case number and follow the court or DPS process that applies to the record being corrected or restricted.
Use full name plus date of birth or stronger lawful identifiers; resolve a disputed name match with fingerprint-based review when appropriate.
Record county, court and case number. Texas has no single statewide trial-court portal.
Separate arrest, charge, amended charge, dismissal, deferred disposition and conviction.
Record any suspension or ALR action separately from the criminal judgment.
Check the actual court order before stating that a matter was expunged or made subject to nondisclosure.
Keep the date and source with each result so later changes can be identified.
The FTC says employers using a consumer reporting company must provide the required disclosure and obtain written permission before the report, and must follow pre-adverse and adverse-action notice steps when the report affects the decision. Verify a disputed DWI outcome at the court before allowing a data mismatch to drive a consequential decision.